Volltextergebnisse:
- populaerwissenschaftliches_basteln
- pularscientifi00tissrich#page/n7/mode/2up|Popular scientific recreations in natural philosophy, astronomy, geo
- indexierungsopfer
- 1088|The Non-trivial Effects of Trivial Errors in Scientific Communication and Evaluation]] trägt. Zur Begründ
- hypotheses.de
- shocknawe.hypotheses.org/546|„Make the humanities scientific again – Denken in Modellen“]] von Remo Grolimund
- gegen_gated_scientific_communities
- ====== Gegen "gated scientific communities" ====== [[http://geschichtedergegenwart.ch/wissen-fuer-alle-open-ac
- fake_science
- einem Artikel in der [[http://news.sciencemag.org/scientific-community/2015/11/feature-how-hijack-journal|Scie
- alles_so_schoen_bunt_hier
- ehirnbild. (via [[https://twitter.com/sciamblogs|Scientific American auf Twitter]]) {{tag>Neurowissenschafte
- 20120331
- chaft ====== [[http://access.okfn.org/2012/03/20/scientific-social-networks-are-the-future-of-science/|Scientific social networks are the future of science]] meint Tom O
- 20120103
- ing"]] - Blog-Artikel von Davide Castelvecchi auf Scientific American {{tag>Wissenschaft Web_2.0}} ~~DISCU
- 20120115
- cientificamerican.com/guest-blog|Guest Blog]] auf Scientific American: [[http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/g
- 20120107
- so: "AuthorMapper, an online tool for visualizing scientific research, enables document discovery based on aut... e that allows you to: \\ * Explore patterns in scientific research * Identify new and historic literature
- 20111026
- free to access online.]] Around 60,000 historical scientific papers are accessible via a [[http://royalsociety